The Denial of Death
by Ernest Becker
The prospect of
death, Dr. Johnson said, wonderfully concentrates the mind. The main thesis
of this book is that it does much more than that: the idea of death, the fear
of it, haunts the human animal like nothing else; it is a mainspring of human
activity—activity designed largely to avoid the fatality of death, to
overcome it by denying in some way that it is the final destiny for man.
— Ernest Becker, xvii
|
I completed a
recent reading of this old classic yesterday (13 December, 2015) because I was
interested in Becker’s contribution to Terror Management Theory, which I find
so helpful in understanding the ways U.S. leaders are publicly responding to
terrorist activities.
Becker’s ideas
are more than forty years old and many have not withstood the test of time.
However, his basic premise that we deny the reality of death in many ways
remains valid. And his examples of the ways we carry out heroic quests to deal
with our mortality continue to provide a way to analyze the ostentatious
projects of billionaire industrialists, outlandish policy statements of
politicians, and inflammatory action calls of religious leaders as well as the
microprojects of ordinary folks. Culture provides many organized ways for
people to gain recognition and thereby bask in at least a slither of potential
eternal glow following an otherwise ignominious death. The hope is, at least that
one’s family and close friends may keep us alive in their memories.
Part I: The Depth Psychology of Heroism
To contemporary
readers, and especially to psychological scientists, the heavy dependence on
psychoanalytic theory for explanatory concepts will seem archaic if not
off-putting. As a psychologist, it was an informative reminder of the influence
Freud and his often rebellious protégées had on societal leaders and academics
for decades. At times it appears Freud is a foil for Becker’s ideas but I think
this is primarily because one could not reasonably discuss the ideas of others
without the Freudian context.
Setting aside the
psychoanalytic jargon, Becker adequately makes his point that death as a force
for life can be seen in the work of philosophers such as Kierkegaard as well as
the early psychoanalysts. What continues to be helpful here and elsewhere is
his capacity to view the competing approaches of anxiety offered by psychology
and religion—primarily Christianity. So we can find culturally approved ways to
live on in creative works that hang in museums or stand in public places or we
can be honored with plaques for our service and generosity. Of course, traditional Christianity
offers another path. People may be poor and unknown in this world but God sees their good works and will reward them in the hereafter—and most noteworthy, the
Christian has eternal life free of the pain common to that felt in mortal
bodies.
I am particularly
interested in the psychology of religion so Becker, as a cultural
anthropologist, offers me a different perspective. An example relevant to our
religious-linked terrorism can be found in Becker’s early words: “…ideological
conflicts between cultures are essentially battles between immortality
projects, holy wars (xiii).”
Part II: The Failures of Heroism
I’ll confess that
as Becker plumbed the depths of psychoanalysis, I found it difficult to keep my
focus on his big ideas rather than what I perceive to be the limitations of psychoanalysis.
Nevertheless, I perked up at his discussions of neuroses, psychoses, and other
varieties of mental illness because it revealed a worldview that has changed
remarkably in the past four decades. Although the psychoanalytic worldview
continues, it does not drive the bulk of scientific inquiry nor does it
characterize the primary methodologies of psychotherapists. But Becker’s
analysis reveals how people used to view people with a mental illness.
Those interested
in the contemporary issues of LGBTQ+ rights will find his discussion of
homosexuality particularly enlightening regarding the views held by the medical
and psychological establishment for the majority of the 20th Century.
As you might
guess from the section title, "mental illness is a failure of heroism," people
have lost their ability to succeed within their culture. They have not found a
path to victory over life’s battles.
Part III: Retrospect and Conclusion: The
Dilemmas of Heroism
Part III consists
of one chapter, Psychology and Religion: What is the Heroic Individual? I see
Becker offering a competing choice between a psychological view and a religious
view. The psychological approach uncovers reality and focuses the patient on
coping with the vicissitudes of this life. However, the psychological view is
much like a religion where people are gods. It has the elements of a special
language and even rituals but the hope is in the adequacy of the patient
presumably learned from the psychotherapist. In contrast, the religious view
offers what some people seem to really need—a belief in a higher power.
I’ll include two quotes to show how Becker sums up his ideas.
What
most people usually do is to follow one person’s ideas and then another’s,
depending on who looms largest on one’s horizon at the time. The one with the
deepest voice, the strongest appearance, the most authority and success, is
usually the one who gets our momentary allegiance; and we try to pattern our
ideals after him. (p. 255)
Today
we know that people try so hard to win converts for their point of view because
it is more than merely an outlook on life: it is an immortality formula. (p. 255)
Reflections
I write as a Christian
with a long history as a psychotherapist and psychologist of religion. I find
Becker offers a number of insights into the various anxiety management efforts
of entire cultures, religious rituals, and the everyday efforts of people who
would live on in their social media pages, memoirs, selfies, arts and crafts,
and countless other ways.
Becker also offers
a warning of sorts to psychotherapists. He’s not the first of course to notice
the similarities between priests and psychotherapists. But he does emphasize
the similarities of religion and psychotherapy and suggests the limitations of
each. Religion offers an other-worldly solution to the problem of existential
anxiety but psychotherapy helps people cope with the anxieties of daily life.
In my view, effectively treating religious clients ought to be a collaborative
effort between clergy and clinician. And clinicians ought to broach religious
ideas carefully as they may not conform to scientific realism but they may well
serve an important function of buffering clients against their struggles. That
is, removing a key element of a person’s
faith may leave them without a vital component of their support system.
The Denial of
Death was originally copyrighted in 1973. Becker won a Pulitzer Prize for the
work in 1974. More about the author can be found at his foundation, http://ernestbecker.org/
|
Cite this review (APA)
Sutton, G. W. (2015, December 13). Denial of death and the meaningful life- book review. Interdisciplinary Book and Film Reviews. Retrieved from https://suttonreviews.suttong.com/2015/12/denial-of-death-and-meaningful-life.html?spref=fb&fbclid=IwAR1OqEPAukVS_-dM7lSHaKD5DxE8VHFUeJgY69-X2h3ov3exebH6unITQEM
Related Post
Terror Management Theory
Terror Management Theory
Reference (The
version I read).
Becker, E. (1997).
The denial of death. New York: Free
Press.
My books on AMAZON or GOOGLE
My books on AMAZON or GOOGLE
Connections
My Page www.suttong.com
My Books AMAZON GOOGLE PLAY STORE
FACEBOOK Geoff
W. Sutton
PINTEREST www.pinterest.com/GeoffWSutton
Publications (many free downloads)
Academia Geoff
W Sutton (PhD)
ResearchGate
Geoffrey W Sutton (PhD)
line 36: not -> nor
ReplyDeleteThe concept of heroic response to death awareness reminds me of U.S. Grant writing his memoirs when he had cancer which lead to his death.
With respect to the quote from Becker, "It is an immortality formula," makes me think that or effort to convert is linked to our belief in truth, that truth matters, that it is a route or connection to a reality which can't be touched/damaged by us or others. It is supposed to be immutable, therefore, self defending, and self evident once people are faced with it. But this has turned out not to be true in so many cases.
Thanks for the correction and insightful comment.
DeletePrev comment by Doug Olena.
ReplyDelete