Skip to main content

Genesis for Normal People by Enns and Byas A Book Review

 Genesis for Normal People

A Guide to the Most Controversial,     

Misunderstood, and Abused

Book of the Bible

By

   Peter Enns &

   Jared Byas

    2019

 

Reviewed by

   Geoffrey W. Sutton

I agree with the authors that Genesis for Normal People is for those who want to a better understanding of Genesis without mastering Hebrew and attending seminary. I’ve thought about what I wish they had included but I’m neither a religious scholar nor a popular author so, I’ll offer a summary of the book and note some points worth considering. Depending on how much you have read about this old document called Genesis, you might learn a few things like I did or at least think about Genesis in a different way.

My plan is to present a summary of this easy-to-read introduction to Genesis by focusing on the authors’ key points.

1. Genesis is an ancient Israelite story. To understand that story requires an appreciation of the Israelites who likely received it after returning from exile in Babylon some 2,500 years ago.

2. Genesis is the first in a series of stories about the relationship between Israel and God. The sequence of ten sections tell the Israelites how their ancestors struggled with God before ending up in Egypt, which leads to the next set of stories in Exodus.

3. The creation story contrasts the work of the God of Israel to other extant stories. The creation story is about bringing order out of chaos.

4. The story of the first couple, their family, and their struggles is like the story of the nation of Israel, which will unfold in later stories. The Adam’s family plight includes recurrent themes of relationship, disobedience, and exile. Like Israel, the early family refused wisdom and thereby lost the blessings of life in the land God had prepared for them.

5. Cain’s story leads him further from God. So, the story of Israel continues down the line of Seth until the infamous flood.

6. Flood stories are found elsewhere in the area. The destruction is unbelievable and such events are seen as the consequences of disobedience.

7. The tower of Babel is a slam against their conqueror, the Babel-onians—those thorns in the side of the Israelites.

8. Abraham arrives on the scene. Like Israel after the exile, Abraham comes out of Babylon and enters Canaan. The struggle between Israel and God can be seen in the family struggle to find a way, outside the promise, to start a family. Like Adam following Eve, Abraham follows Sarah. And then there was trouble.

9. We meet Isaac the father of Israel.

10. We see another struggle between brothers. The younger one gets the name of Israel and, despite stories of deception, ends up creating the tribal leaders of this fledgling nation.

11. One of the young sons is a favorite and he suffers for it. In the end, this rejected and exiled Joseph ends up saving his family and in doing so, he saves Israel.

The book ends on page 152 following a short conclusion. After this, there is a leader’s guide to foster discussion of each chapter.

**********

I’ve been told by others that scholarly writers who are writing trade books like this one should focus on one overarching theme and not write as if they are dealing with the issues of concern to scholars. It seems to me that something like this sort of advice influenced this book.

For whatever reason, the authors avoid the seething cauldron of life evolving out of the primeval swamps rather than being made by God and having to marry their cousins. They skip the curious sexual misdeeds—including that strange scifi-like account of supernatural beings mating with women that can prod the curious to wonder what kind of book this is. And they skirt the tantalizing story of Sodom and Gomorrah often quoted in the current concerns about same sex-sex and the church.

What these authors might accomplish is the creation of a first set of lenses to wear when reading ancient texts to learn how ancient Jews learned about God and their relationship to God. And that without such lenses, the past is too far in the distance to be seen correctly. Surely the lenses of modern historians and scientists will not serve to understand a series of stories heard by the remnant returning to their homeland after years in a foreign land full of foreign stories populated with someone else’s gods.

Reference

Enns, P. & Byas, J. (2019). Genesis for normal people: A guide to the most controversial, misunderstood, and abused book of the Bible, Second Edition. thebiblefornormalpeople.com

 See related books Progressive Christianity

 

Please check out my website   www.suttong.com

   and see my books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Also, consider connecting with me on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   X   @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Denial of Death and the Meaningful Life- Book Review

  The Denial of Death   by Ernest Becker A Review by Geoffrey W. Sutton The prospect of death, Dr. Johnson said, wonderfully concentrates the mind. The main thesis of this book is that it does much more than that: the idea of death, the fear of it, haunts the human animal like nothing else; it is a mainspring of human activity—activity designed largely to avoid the fatality of death, to overcome it by denying in some way that it is the final destiny for man.  — Ernest Becker, xvii I completed a recent reading of this old classic yesterday (13 December, 2015) because I was interested in Becker’s contribution to Terror Management Theory, which I find so helpful in understanding the ways U.S. leaders are publicly responding to terrorist activities. Becker’s ideas are more than forty years old and many have not withstood the test of time. However, his basic premise that we deny the reality of death in many ways remains valid

JESUS AND JOHN WAYNE - A book review

  JESUS AND JOHN WAYNE How White Evangelicals        Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation By    Kristin Kobes Du Mez Reviewed by    Geoffrey W. Sutton   Kristin Kobes Du Mez begins and ends her assault on militaristic white American evangelical men with their contemporary sociopolitical leader, former president, Donald Trump. In the Introduction we learn the short doctrinal list of what it means to be a Bible-believing evangelical, but the author posits that American evangelicals are more than a set of theological statements. Instead, since the early 1900s they have embraced a John Wayne view of what it means to be a Christian man—a powerful warrior for country and God—a man who leads his troops into battle to uphold the values of God’s chosen people, the Americans. It was the title, Jesus and John Wayne , that was off-putting. I didn’t grow up with John Wayne films or a love of American westerns. I was after all British and even after living in America, we

Why I am not a Christian - Bertrand Russell - A book Review

 Why I Am Not A         Christian By   Bertrand Russell Reviewed by   Geoffrey W. Sutton   I am still surprised by the memory of a professor at a highly conservative college who included Russell’s book, Why I am not a Christian as assigned reading in a Philosophy of Christianity class. I don’t recall what the professor said about the collection of essays so many years ago. However, it is a classic work and deserves at least a look by those like me interested in the psychology of religion and related fields like philosophy. The lead essay answers the author’s question in the title. It was presented as a lecture at the Battersea Town Hall (London, England) in 1927. His logical thinking is evident early on as he attempts to define the concept, Christian . He considers a few options and concludes first, that a Christian must believe in God and immortality, and second, a Christian must at least think of Christ as the “best and wisest of men.” The essay proceeds to explain w