Skip to main content

The GOD PROBLEM

 


The GOD PROBLEM

How a Godless Cosmos Creates

By Howard Bloom

Reviewed by

     Geoffrey W. Sutton


In the beginning…that is about 13.787 billion years ago our universe began.

Bloom invites us to return to the beginning so we might observe how the universe created itself without recourse to supernatural explanations. Time is a stairway. On each post-big-bang step we pause to observe what’s new. What’s unfolding. Eventually, humans emerge on earth and begin to use models to represent their world to modify their environment.

Soon humans are standing on the steps of time and looking at the stars. Bloom captures various moments when our forebears began to unravel the mysteries of the cosmos. At first, the progress is small. Primitive ideas slowly become more complex. At times, Bloom meanders and repeats phrases like a parent reminding child of life’s truisms. 

Then, a few centuries ago, Bloom is off and running from one scientist to another scooping up bits of knowledge that, when organized into mathematical formulas and multidimensional models, suggest how a naturalist might account for the emergence of all the marvelous things we now observe thanks to powerful aids to our limited senses.

Short Story of Bloom’s God Problem

What Bloom offers is a systematic review of the myriad ways scientists have increasingly explained the existence of natural phenomena and the origins of life without including God or gods in their explanatory models. I suppose if he were so inclined, he could have referred to “theological models” as metaphors for ways humans tried to explain the majestic appearance of the heavens or the incredible diversity of life. Nevertheless, Bloom demonstrates how metaphors guide new discoveries until new observations require a new explanation. Bloom reviews new models and new metaphors that moved us ahead one more step on the staircase of time toward the holy grail of science, an explanation of everything.

As we near the end of the multibillion year journey, we see that even the tremendous advances made possible by ever increasingly complex mathematical and data processing models may still need to be revised to fully explain how our universe can create what we perceive as an orderly cosmos teeming with intelligent life capable of an eternal existence or perhaps a death and rebirth.

History is replete with evidence that religious leaders fought against scientific explanations for phenomena theologians once attributed to God. Bloom wisely ignores these faith-science battle episodes, although he briefly mentions intelligent design. His enthusiasm reveals that he has been seduced by the quest for the meaning of life. He has been recruited by the grandest recruiting strategy of all time to be a member of the team that solves the god problem. Exactly how does the universe create all that is? 

Have scientists solved the god problem? Have they explained the origins of the universe and life to your satisfaction? However you answer the question of origins, Bloom offers a cornucopia of amazing discoveries that explain in considerable detail so much more about the cosmos than our ancestors could have imagined.

 Book Reference

Bloom, H. (2012). The God problem: How a godless cosmos creates. NY: Prometheus.

  Book Author

Howard Bloom is an American philosopher of science and former visiting scholar at the Graduate School of Psychology at NYU. He has published numerous articles and books on scientific subjects.

 




Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Denial of Death and the Meaningful Life- Book Review

  The Denial of Death   by Ernest Becker A Review by Geoffrey W. Sutton The prospect of death, Dr. Johnson said, wonderfully concentrates the mind. The main thesis of this book is that it does much more than that: the idea of death, the fear of it, haunts the human animal like nothing else; it is a mainspring of human activity—activity designed largely to avoid the fatality of death, to overcome it by denying in some way that it is the final destiny for man.  — Ernest Becker, xvii I completed a recent reading of this old classic yesterday (13 December, 2015) because I was interested in Becker’s contribution to Terror Management Theory, which I find so helpful in understanding the ways U.S. leaders are publicly responding to terrorist activities. Becker’s ideas are more than forty years old and many have not withstood the test of time. However, his basic premise that we deny the reality of death in many ways remains valid

JESUS AND JOHN WAYNE - A book review

  JESUS AND JOHN WAYNE How White Evangelicals        Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation By    Kristin Kobes Du Mez Reviewed by    Geoffrey W. Sutton   Kristin Kobes Du Mez begins and ends her assault on militaristic white American evangelical men with their contemporary sociopolitical leader, former president, Donald Trump. In the Introduction we learn the short doctrinal list of what it means to be a Bible-believing evangelical, but the author posits that American evangelicals are more than a set of theological statements. Instead, since the early 1900s they have embraced a John Wayne view of what it means to be a Christian man—a powerful warrior for country and God—a man who leads his troops into battle to uphold the values of God’s chosen people, the Americans. It was the title, Jesus and John Wayne , that was off-putting. I didn’t grow up with John Wayne films or a love of American westerns. I was after all British and even after living in America, we

Why I am not a Christian - Bertrand Russell - A book Review

 Why I Am Not A         Christian By   Bertrand Russell Reviewed by   Geoffrey W. Sutton   I am still surprised by the memory of a professor at a highly conservative college who included Russell’s book, Why I am not a Christian as assigned reading in a Philosophy of Christianity class. I don’t recall what the professor said about the collection of essays so many years ago. However, it is a classic work and deserves at least a look by those like me interested in the psychology of religion and related fields like philosophy. The lead essay answers the author’s question in the title. It was presented as a lecture at the Battersea Town Hall (London, England) in 1927. His logical thinking is evident early on as he attempts to define the concept, Christian . He considers a few options and concludes first, that a Christian must believe in God and immortality, and second, a Christian must at least think of Christ as the “best and wisest of men.” The essay proceeds to explain w