Skip to main content

Psychology and Christianity: Five Views -Review

 

Five Views 2024
Geoffrey W Sutton & Bing AI

The second edition of Psychology and Christianity: Five Views is an expanded version of the 2000 edition. Edited by Eric L. Johnson, the book presents ways to understand the relationship between psychology and Christianity.

 [Available on Amazon]

The Five Views

 

1. Levels-of-Explanation View by David Myers, Hope College

 This view suggests that psychology and Christianity operate at different levels of explanation. Psychology operates at the level of human behavior and mental processes, while Christianity operates at the level of meaning and value.

 

2. Integration View by Stanton Jones, Wheaton College

 This view proposes that psychology and Christianity can be integrated in a way that both can contribute to a fuller understanding of human nature.

 

3. Christian Psychology View by Robert Roberts (Baylor University) and P. J. Watson (University of Tennessee-Chattanooga)

 This view argues that a distinctly Christian psychology is needed, one that is grounded in the teachings of the Bible and informed by a Christian understanding of human nature.

 

4. Transformational Psychology View by John Coe and Todd Hall, Rosemeade Graduate School of Psychology

 This view emphasizes the transformative power of Christianity and suggests that psychological change must involve spiritual transformation.

 

5. Biblical Counseling View by David Powlison, Westminister Theological Seminary

 This view argues that the Bible provides the most accurate and helpful guidance for counseling, and that secular psychology should be used cautiously.

 

The authors present their viewpoints with humility, understanding the complexity of relating psychology and Christianity. The first two views focus on clear descriptions and arguments, while the last three views provide practical illustrations and examples, considering the real-world application of psychology. The book has become a standard introductory textbook for students and professors of Christian psychology.

 


APA Reference:

Johnson, E. L. (Ed.). (2010). Psychology and Christianity: Five Views (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.

Available on AMAZON

Reflections

I approached this text with my usual analytic approach to opinion articles. I earned my PhD in psychology at the University of Missouri-Columbia at a time when the emphasis was on the science of psychology, which embraced the scientific experiment as the gold standard for obtaining reliable evidence about human nature. It was not a faith-unfriendly place. At least four of the faculty I routinely encountered identified as Christian and so did several students. Nevertheless, religion and spirituality were not included in the curriculum. At the time, mid-1970s, only a few psychologists had written about Christianity and psychology and they focused on psychotherapy rather than psychological science.

Although I could understand the importance of faith to patients in psychotherapy, other aspects of psychological science seemed removed from such discussions. For example, how would a Christian perspective change what we learned about the functioning of the brain, the assessment of brain functions, and the problems associated with brain injuries? As another example, I wondered how it would make a difference in psychological evaluations. Christian and non-Christian psychologists administered the same tests to Christian and non-Christian patients, scored them the same way, referred to the same criteria for diagnoses, and made recommendations for interventions based on the best available treatments.

Psychological science deals with the natural world. Christianity includes the supernatural realm, which is beyond the scope of psychology. Sometimes psychology and Christianity do offer perspectives on the same or similar topics like parenting, marriage, alcohol abuse, and forgiveness. Although, Christians often differ among themselves and with psychological findings on the best way to parent, treat alcohol dependence or abuse, and deal with the expression of forgiveness and the related concept of reconciliation.  

A full integration or a full reconciliation of Christianity and psychological science does not yet exist. And in my view, there are too many nonoverlapping concerns to have a synthesis that most Christian scholars would say yields a fully integrated model. After all, serious thinkers have addressed the topic for several decades. Furthermore, I suggest that Christians often end up reinterpreting the scriptures to accommodate a scientific finding such as the evidence supporting a combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychopharmacology to treat depression.

Regardless of my concerns about a viable model of integration or a reconciliation of Christianity and psychology, I do think this book or a similar set of views is worth considering by graduate students who wish to understand different perspectives on the relationship between faith and psychology.

Related posts

Evolution, Psychology, and Christianity: Irreconcilable Differences



Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Denial of Death and the Meaningful Life- Book Review

  The Denial of Death   by Ernest Becker A Review by Geoffrey W. Sutton The prospect of death, Dr. Johnson said, wonderfully concentrates the mind. The main thesis of this book is that it does much more than that: the idea of death, the fear of it, haunts the human animal like nothing else; it is a mainspring of human activity—activity designed largely to avoid the fatality of death, to overcome it by denying in some way that it is the final destiny for man.  — Ernest Becker, xvii I completed a recent reading of this old classic yesterday (13 December, 2015) because I was interested in Becker’s contribution to Terror Management Theory, which I find so helpful in understanding the ways U.S. leaders are publicly responding to terrorist activities. Becker’s ideas are more than forty years old and many have not withstood the test of time. However, his basic premise that we deny the reality of death in many ways remains valid
3 comments
Read more

JESUS AND JOHN WAYNE - A book review

  JESUS AND JOHN WAYNE How White Evangelicals        Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation By    Kristin Kobes Du Mez Reviewed by    Geoffrey W. Sutton   Kristin Kobes Du Mez begins and ends her assault on militaristic white American evangelical men with their contemporary sociopolitical leader, former president, Donald Trump. In the Introduction we learn the short doctrinal list of what it means to be a Bible-believing evangelical, but the author posits that American evangelicals are more than a set of theological statements. Instead, since the early 1900s they have embraced a John Wayne view of what it means to be a Christian man—a powerful warrior for country and God—a man who leads his troops into battle to uphold the values of God’s chosen people, the Americans. It was the title, Jesus and John Wayne , that was off-putting. I didn’t grow up with John Wayne films or a love of American westerns. I was after all British and even after living in America, we
Post a Comment
Read more

Why I am not a Christian - Bertrand Russell - A book Review

 Why I Am Not A         Christian By   Bertrand Russell Reviewed by   Geoffrey W. Sutton   I am still surprised by the memory of a professor at a highly conservative college who included Russell’s book, Why I am not a Christian as assigned reading in a Philosophy of Christianity class. I don’t recall what the professor said about the collection of essays so many years ago. However, it is a classic work and deserves at least a look by those like me interested in the psychology of religion and related fields like philosophy. The lead essay answers the author’s question in the title. It was presented as a lecture at the Battersea Town Hall (London, England) in 1927. His logical thinking is evident early on as he attempts to define the concept, Christian . He considers a few options and concludes first, that a Christian must believe in God and immortality, and second, a Christian must at least think of Christ as the “best and wisest of men.” The essay proceeds to explain w
Post a Comment
Read more