Skip to main content

Atheists Religion and Psychology - Book Reviews or Summaries

My introduction to atheism occurred at a Christian college where I was required to read Bertrand Russell's classic work, Why I am not a Christian." Thoughtful atheists offer people who identify as religious or spiritual  an opportunity to examine their beliefs, practices, and experiences. And I hope, thoughtful religious and spiritual leaders offer meaningful challenges for thoughtful atheists. I have reviewed some of the major books in this list. Some reviews are based on academic essays published in psychology journals.

**********

Breaking the Spell by Daniel Dennett

 

 

 

 

Book

REVIEW

 

BUY on

AMAZON


UK AMAZON

 

BUY on 

GOOGLE

Caught in the Pulpit: Leaving Faith Behind by Daniel C. Dennett & Linda LaScola

 

 

Book

REVIEW

 

BUY on

AMAZON


UK AMAZON

 

BUY on

GOOGLE

The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason by Sam Harris

 

 

 

 

Book

REVIEW

 

BUY on

AMAZON


UK AMAZON

 

BUY on

 GOOGLE

The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins 

 

 

Book

REVIEW

 

BUY on

AMAZON


UK AMAZON

 

BUY on

 GOOGLE

god is not Great: How religion poisons everything by Christopher Hitchens 

 

 

 

Book 

REVIEW

 

BUY on

AMAZON

 

BUY on

 GOOGLE

  Why I am not a Christian by Bertrand Russell

 

 

 

 

Book

REVIEW

 

BUY on

AMAZON


UK AMAZON

 

BUY on

 GOOGLE

 Why I Became an Atheist by John W. Loftus 

 

   

 

 

Book

REVIEW

 

BUY on

AMAZON


UK AMAZON

 

BUY on GOOGLE

 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Denial of Death and the Meaningful Life- Book Review

  The Denial of Death   by Ernest Becker A Review by Geoffrey W. Sutton The prospect of death, Dr. Johnson said, wonderfully concentrates the mind. The main thesis of this book is that it does much more than that: the idea of death, the fear of it, haunts the human animal like nothing else; it is a mainspring of human activity—activity designed largely to avoid the fatality of death, to overcome it by denying in some way that it is the final destiny for man.  — Ernest Becker, xvii I completed a recent reading of this old classic yesterday (13 December, 2015) because I was interested in Becker’s contribution to Terror Management Theory, which I find so helpful in understanding the ways U.S. leaders are publicly responding to terrorist activities. Becker’s ideas are more than forty years old and many have not withstood the test of time. However, his basic premise that we deny the reality of death in many ways remains valid
3 comments
Read more

JESUS AND JOHN WAYNE - A book review

  JESUS AND JOHN WAYNE How White Evangelicals        Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation By    Kristin Kobes Du Mez Reviewed by    Geoffrey W. Sutton   Kristin Kobes Du Mez begins and ends her assault on militaristic white American evangelical men with their contemporary sociopolitical leader, former president, Donald Trump. In the Introduction we learn the short doctrinal list of what it means to be a Bible-believing evangelical, but the author posits that American evangelicals are more than a set of theological statements. Instead, since the early 1900s they have embraced a John Wayne view of what it means to be a Christian man—a powerful warrior for country and God—a man who leads his troops into battle to uphold the values of God’s chosen people, the Americans. It was the title, Jesus and John Wayne , that was off-putting. I didn’t grow up with John Wayne films or a love of American westerns. I was after all British and even after living in America, we
Post a Comment
Read more

Why I am not a Christian - Bertrand Russell - A book Review

 Why I Am Not A         Christian By   Bertrand Russell Reviewed by   Geoffrey W. Sutton   I am still surprised by the memory of a professor at a highly conservative college who included Russell’s book, Why I am not a Christian as assigned reading in a Philosophy of Christianity class. I don’t recall what the professor said about the collection of essays so many years ago. However, it is a classic work and deserves at least a look by those like me interested in the psychology of religion and related fields like philosophy. The lead essay answers the author’s question in the title. It was presented as a lecture at the Battersea Town Hall (London, England) in 1927. His logical thinking is evident early on as he attempts to define the concept, Christian . He considers a few options and concludes first, that a Christian must believe in God and immortality, and second, a Christian must at least think of Christ as the “best and wisest of men.” The essay proceeds to explain w
Post a Comment
Read more